Andrew J. Bacevich Subscribe

Andrew J. Bacevich is professor emeritus of history and international relations at Boston University. He is the author of America's War for the Greater Middle East.

February 1, 2019|Andrew Bacevich, Christopher Lasch, Donald Trump, Iraq War, Middle East, Twilight of the American Century

“Slouching Towards Mar-a-Lago:” A Conversation with Andrew Bacevich

by Andrew J. Bacevich|3 Comments

Andrew Bacevich discusses his new book Twilight of the American Century

Justifying Originalism

A discussion with Lee J. Strang

Originalism provides the surest way to access the Constitution's legal meaning and then to implement it over time.

How Sheen, King, & Falwell Changed American Politics

A discussion with James M. Patterson

James Patterson talks about three legendary clergymen in America and how they shaped our public discourse.

Dissecting the Trump-Russia Investigations: A Conversation with Andrew McCarthy

A discussion with Andrew McCarthy

Andrew McCarthy discusses the investigations of the Trump campaign's alleged collusion with the Russian government.

An Invitation to the Land of Hope: A Conversation with Bill McClay

A discussion with Wilfred M. McClay

Bill McClay talks with Richard Reinsch about his new book, Land of Hope.

Lessons of a Libertarian

Gerrit Wormhoudt on how we ended up with educational and cultural institutions that have undermined the liberties the Constitution was written to secure.
by Roger Pilon
Why the “Happy Warrior,” Al Smith, Wasn’t Happy About the New Deal

Franklin Roosevelt’s version of Progressivism was more statist than Smith’s.
by Jay Cost
Justifying Originalism

Originalism provides the surest way to access the Constitution's legal meaning and then to implement it over time.
by Lee J. Strang
Originalism’s Expanding Popularity

The normative justification for originalism—honest reading—is compelling and causing cracks in the once solid wall of opposition to originalism.
by James R. Rogers
Elizabeth Warren’s “Accountable” Court

The Senator from Harvard has no conception of the proper judicial role other than that it should favor litigants whose political stances she supports.
by Greg Weiner

Law & Liberty’s focus is on the classical liberal tradition of law and political thought and how it shapes a society of free and responsible persons. This site brings together serious debate, commentary, essays, book reviews, interviews, and educational material in a commitment to the first principles of law in a free society. Law & Liberty considers a range of foundational and contemporary legal issues, legal philosophy, and pedagogy.

The opinions expressed on Law & Liberty are solely those of the contributors to the site and do not reflect the opinions of Liberty Fund.

Andrew J. Bacevich Subscribe

About